Here is a polemical piece on the New Atheism I wrote for The American, the journal of the American Enterprise Institute. In part it summarizes points I’ve made elsewhere, but it is primarily a discussion of the New Atheists’ tactic (invented by my longtime admirer P. Z. Myers) of shouting “Courtier’s reply!” whenever someone exposes their utter ignorance of what some religious thinker they are criticizing has actually said – a piece of Orwellian doublethink which by itself would suffice to illustrate the extreme decadence into which much secularist “thought” has fallen, if that were not blindingly obvious already. (For the memory impaired, I suppose I need to repeat what I have acknowledged so many times – that not all atheists are worthy of the contempt the “new” atheists so richly deserve. J. L. Mackie, J. J. C. Smart, Quentin Smith, and Jordan Howard Sobel – to take just four examples off the top of my head – are serious thinkers whose work must be treated by the theist with respect. Dawkins, Myers, Harris, Dennett, et al. are not worthy to be mentioned in the same breath.)
Thứ Năm, 25 tháng 3, 2010
Here is a polemical piece on the New Atheism I wrote for The American, the journal of the American Enterprise Institute. In part it summarizes points I’ve made elsewhere, but it is primarily a discussion of the New Atheists’ tactic (invented by my longtime admirer P. Z. Myers) of shouting “Courtier’s reply!” whenever someone exposes their utter ignorance of what some religious thinker they are criticizing has actually said – a piece of Orwellian doublethink which by itself would suffice to illustrate the extreme decadence into which much secularist “thought” has fallen, if that were not blindingly obvious already. (For the memory impaired, I suppose I need to repeat what I have acknowledged so many times – that not all atheists are worthy of the contempt the “new” atheists so richly deserve. J. L. Mackie, J. J. C. Smart, Quentin Smith, and Jordan Howard Sobel – to take just four examples off the top of my head – are serious thinkers whose work must be treated by the theist with respect. Dawkins, Myers, Harris, Dennett, et al. are not worthy to be mentioned in the same breath.)
Đăng ký:
Đăng Nhận xét (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
Concluding my overview of the main varieties of Thomism, with some final outtakes taken straight from the Aquinas cutting room floor : 6....
-
Hylemorphic dualism is the approach to the mind-body problem taken by Aquinas and the Thomist tradition more generally. (The label may have...
-
Mount Saint Mary College in Newburgh, NY will be hosting the Fourth Annual Philosophy Workshop on the theme “Aquinas on God” from June 5-8...
-
Here is a piece I wrote for National Review Online about the political correctness controversy brewing over Wiley-Blackwell’s Encyclopedia...
-
Stop me if you’ve heard this one before, but while we’re on the subject of humor , here’s another mistake that is often made in discussions...
-
For newer readers and others who might be interested, I will occasionally be reprinting some old posts from the now defunct Conservative Phi...
-
A reader asks me to comment on novelist Scott Bakker’s recent Scientia Salon article “Back to Square One: toward a post-intentional futur...
-
I called attention some time back to Editiones scholasticae , a new German publishing venture devoted to publishing works in Scholastic phi...
-
In a recent post I spoke of the soul after death as essentially the human being in a “radically diminished state.” The Aristotelian-Thomi...
-
The Catholic Adult Education Centre of the Archdiocese of Sydney is kindly hosting me for a week-long speaking tour from July 23 - 29. You ...
Blogger news
Blogger templates
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(154)
-
▼
tháng 3
(17)
- 2010 Thomistic Seminar
- 2010 Gifford Lectures
- “We are at war with Eastasia. We have always been...
- Stupak’s enablers?
- The New Philistinism
- Rota on causation in Aquinas
- Oderberg on the First Way
- Here's Hope for you, Mr. Obama
- Blogging note
- Recovering Sight after Scientism
- Stove on contemporary academic style
- New from John Haldane
- Blinded by Scientism
- From philosophy to misosophy
- Gee, I thought I was Harlan Ellison…
- Scholastic’s Bookshelf, Part III
- Mood enhancement
-
▼
tháng 3
(17)
Blogroll
About
Copyright ©
Edward Feser | Powered by Blogger
Design by Azmind.com | Blogger Template by NewBloggerThemes.com
0 nhận xét:
Đăng nhận xét