My readers should know that Vincent Torley has added a disclaimer to his recent post, apologizing for any misrepresentation of my views contained in the post. I appreciate this, and I apologize if the tone of my original response to Torley and his fellow ID defenders Jay Richards and Denyse O’Leary (which I have since replaced) was excessively harsh. Torley has also put up another post, as has Thomas Cudworth. I will reply to them as soon as I am able.
Popular Posts
-
Concluding my overview of the main varieties of Thomism, with some final outtakes taken straight from the Aquinas cutting room floor : 6....
-
Hylemorphic dualism is the approach to the mind-body problem taken by Aquinas and the Thomist tradition more generally. (The label may have... -
Mount Saint Mary College in Newburgh, NY will be hosting the Fourth Annual Philosophy Workshop on the theme “Aquinas on God” from June 5-8... -
Here is a piece I wrote for National Review Online about the political correctness controversy brewing over Wiley-Blackwell’s Encyclopedia...
-
Stop me if you’ve heard this one before, but while we’re on the subject of humor , here’s another mistake that is often made in discussions... -
For newer readers and others who might be interested, I will occasionally be reprinting some old posts from the now defunct Conservative Phi...
-
A reader asks me to comment on novelist Scott Bakker’s recent Scientia Salon article “Back to Square One: toward a post-intentional futur... -
I called attention some time back to Editiones scholasticae , a new German publishing venture devoted to publishing works in Scholastic phi... -
In a recent post I spoke of the soul after death as essentially the human being in a “radically diminished state.” The Aristotelian-Thomi... -
The Catholic Adult Education Centre of the Archdiocese of Sydney is kindly hosting me for a week-long speaking tour from July 23 - 29. You ...
0 nhận xét:
Đăng nhận xét