Keith Pavlischek, who has been reporting on the APA petition controversy for First Things, has the latest developments here. (And see this earlier post of Pavlischek's for a summary of the broader political and cultural trends of which this controversy is but a part. The commissars are just getting started, folks. Brace yourselves.)
Popular Posts
-
A reader asks: [I] was curious, given your work in philosophy of mind, what you would say is the most plausible notion we have of God's... -
A year ago today I put up a post with the title “So you think you understand the cosmological argument?” It generated quite a bit of discu... -
The principle of sufficient reason (PSR), in a typical Neo-Scholastic formulation, states that “there is a sufficient reason or adequate ne... -
While we’re on the subject of Steve Martin , consider the following passage from his memoir Born Standing Up . Martin recounts the insight... -
I commend to you the late historian of philosophy Paul Hoffman’s paper “Does Efficient Causation Presuppose Final Causation? Aquinas vs. ... -
In the sixth of his Meditations on First Philosophy , Descartes writes: [T]here is a vast difference between mind and body, in respect tha... -
Stop me if you’ve heard this one before, but while we’re on the subject of humor , here’s another mistake that is often made in discussions... -
On the subject of time and our awareness of it, Augustine says the following in The Confessions : But how does this future, which does no... -
Today Jonah Goldberg took Kathleen Parker and others to task here for some of the silly and ill-informed things they have been saying in de...
-
Suppose you go out on a blind date and a friend asks you how it went. You pause and then answer flatly, with a slight smirk: “Well, I like...
0 nhận xét:
Đăng nhận xét