Here is a polemical piece on the New Atheism I wrote for The American, the journal of the American Enterprise Institute. In part it summarizes points I’ve made elsewhere, but it is primarily a discussion of the New Atheists’ tactic (invented by my longtime admirer P. Z. Myers) of shouting “Courtier’s reply!” whenever someone exposes their utter ignorance of what some religious thinker they are criticizing has actually said – a piece of Orwellian doublethink which by itself would suffice to illustrate the extreme decadence into which much secularist “thought” has fallen, if that were not blindingly obvious already. (For the memory impaired, I suppose I need to repeat what I have acknowledged so many times – that not all atheists are worthy of the contempt the “new” atheists so richly deserve. J. L. Mackie, J. J. C. Smart, Quentin Smith, and Jordan Howard Sobel – to take just four examples off the top of my head – are serious thinkers whose work must be treated by the theist with respect. Dawkins, Myers, Harris, Dennett, et al. are not worthy to be mentioned in the same breath.)
Thứ Năm, 25 tháng 3, 2010
Here is a polemical piece on the New Atheism I wrote for The American, the journal of the American Enterprise Institute. In part it summarizes points I’ve made elsewhere, but it is primarily a discussion of the New Atheists’ tactic (invented by my longtime admirer P. Z. Myers) of shouting “Courtier’s reply!” whenever someone exposes their utter ignorance of what some religious thinker they are criticizing has actually said – a piece of Orwellian doublethink which by itself would suffice to illustrate the extreme decadence into which much secularist “thought” has fallen, if that were not blindingly obvious already. (For the memory impaired, I suppose I need to repeat what I have acknowledged so many times – that not all atheists are worthy of the contempt the “new” atheists so richly deserve. J. L. Mackie, J. J. C. Smart, Quentin Smith, and Jordan Howard Sobel – to take just four examples off the top of my head – are serious thinkers whose work must be treated by the theist with respect. Dawkins, Myers, Harris, Dennett, et al. are not worthy to be mentioned in the same breath.)
Đăng ký:
Đăng Nhận xét (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
A reader asks: [I] was curious, given your work in philosophy of mind, what you would say is the most plausible notion we have of God's...
-
A year ago today I put up a post with the title “So you think you understand the cosmological argument?” It generated quite a bit of discu...
-
Stop me if you’ve heard this one before, but while we’re on the subject of humor , here’s another mistake that is often made in discussions...
-
My recent Claremont Review of Books review of Scruton’s Soul of the World and Wilson’s The Meaning of Human Existence is now available fo...
-
Check out the recently published Religion and the Social Sciences: Conversations with Robert Bellah and Christian Smith , edited by R. R. Re...
-
In a recent article in National Review , Ian Tuttle tells us that “standup comedy is colliding with progressivism.” He notes that comedian...
-
In the sixth of his Meditations on First Philosophy , Descartes writes: [T]here is a vast difference between mind and body, in respect tha...
-
On the subject of time and our awareness of it, Augustine says the following in The Confessions : But how does this future, which does no...
-
Suppose you go out on a blind date and a friend asks you how it went. You pause and then answer flatly, with a slight smirk: “Well, I like...
-
Today Jonah Goldberg took Kathleen Parker and others to task here for some of the silly and ill-informed things they have been saying in de...
Blogger news
Blogger templates
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(154)
-
▼
tháng 3
(17)
- 2010 Thomistic Seminar
- 2010 Gifford Lectures
- “We are at war with Eastasia. We have always been...
- Stupak’s enablers?
- The New Philistinism
- Rota on causation in Aquinas
- Oderberg on the First Way
- Here's Hope for you, Mr. Obama
- Blogging note
- Recovering Sight after Scientism
- Stove on contemporary academic style
- New from John Haldane
- Blinded by Scientism
- From philosophy to misosophy
- Gee, I thought I was Harlan Ellison…
- Scholastic’s Bookshelf, Part III
- Mood enhancement
-
▼
tháng 3
(17)
Blogroll
About
Copyright ©
Edward Feser | Powered by Blogger
Design by Azmind.com | Blogger Template by NewBloggerThemes.com
0 nhận xét:
Đăng nhận xét