My recent two-part essay on scientism for Public Discourse has just been reprinted as “Hayek and Scientism” in the Spring 2010 issue of The City. If you missed it the first time around, here’s your chance to catch up. And if you did read it before and didn’t like it, see what you think now that it’s got a new title and has been laid out all pretty, magazine-style. Or at least check out the rest of the issue.
Popular Posts
-
A reader asks: [I] was curious, given your work in philosophy of mind, what you would say is the most plausible notion we have of God's... -
A year ago today I put up a post with the title “So you think you understand the cosmological argument?” It generated quite a bit of discu... -
Stop me if you’ve heard this one before, but while we’re on the subject of humor , here’s another mistake that is often made in discussions... -
My recent Claremont Review of Books review of Scruton’s Soul of the World and Wilson’s The Meaning of Human Existence is now available fo... -
Check out the recently published Religion and the Social Sciences: Conversations with Robert Bellah and Christian Smith , edited by R. R. Re... -
In a recent article in National Review , Ian Tuttle tells us that “standup comedy is colliding with progressivism.” He notes that comedian... -
In the sixth of his Meditations on First Philosophy , Descartes writes: [T]here is a vast difference between mind and body, in respect tha... -
On the subject of time and our awareness of it, Augustine says the following in The Confessions : But how does this future, which does no... -
Suppose you go out on a blind date and a friend asks you how it went. You pause and then answer flatly, with a slight smirk: “Well, I like... -
Today Jonah Goldberg took Kathleen Parker and others to task here for some of the silly and ill-informed things they have been saying in de...
0 nhận xét:
Đăng nhận xét