Over at the online edition of First Things, you’ll find my review of Thomas Nagel’s important new book Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False. (Since there’s more to say about the book than I had space for in the review, I may revisit it in a future post.)
Thứ Tư, 17 tháng 10, 2012
Đăng ký:
Đăng Nhận xét (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
A reader asks: [I] was curious, given your work in philosophy of mind, what you would say is the most plausible notion we have of God's...
-
A year ago today I put up a post with the title “So you think you understand the cosmological argument?” It generated quite a bit of discu...
-
The principle of sufficient reason (PSR), in a typical Neo-Scholastic formulation, states that “there is a sufficient reason or adequate ne...
-
While we’re on the subject of Steve Martin , consider the following passage from his memoir Born Standing Up . Martin recounts the insight...
-
I commend to you the late historian of philosophy Paul Hoffman’s paper “Does Efficient Causation Presuppose Final Causation? Aquinas vs. ...
-
In the sixth of his Meditations on First Philosophy , Descartes writes: [T]here is a vast difference between mind and body, in respect tha...
-
Stop me if you’ve heard this one before, but while we’re on the subject of humor , here’s another mistake that is often made in discussions...
-
On the subject of time and our awareness of it, Augustine says the following in The Confessions : But how does this future, which does no...
-
Today Jonah Goldberg took Kathleen Parker and others to task here for some of the silly and ill-informed things they have been saying in de...
-
Suppose you go out on a blind date and a friend asks you how it went. You pause and then answer flatly, with a slight smirk: “Well, I like...
Blogger news
Blogger templates
Blogroll
About
Copyright ©
Edward Feser | Powered by Blogger
Design by Azmind.com | Blogger Template by NewBloggerThemes.com

0 nhận xét:
Đăng nhận xét